I just wrote to my MP

First time I’ve ever done that, with the exception of a couple of organised pro-forma postcard things.

For what it’s worth, here’s what I wrote:

FOR THE ATTENTION OF:
Kali Mountford MP
Colne Valley

Monday 27 November 2006

Dear Kali Mountford,
I am writing to you because I am deeply concerned about the use of creationist and ‘Intelligent Design’ teaching materials in British schools, as reported in The Guardian newspaper on November 27th 2006. A copy of the article is available at the following web address:
http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,1957858,00.html

As creationist and ‘Intelligent Design’ theories are not in any way scientific, relying as they do upon a supernatural explanation for the origin of life, they do not have any place in the science classroom. If they are to be taught at all, they should be dealt with solely in lessons dedicated to the study of religion and culture.

In today’s climate of fear surrounding matters of strong religious belief, it is of utmost importance that our children’s scientific education be based upon a strong foundation of empiricism and rationalism. The teaching of creationism and “Intelligent Design” on an equal footing to proven, accepted scientific fact precludes this absolutely.

The government has a responsibility to ensure that British children receive the best education possible, and to this end the matter of non-scientific teaching in state-funded science classrooms must be investigated and dealt with immediately. The British public has a right to know how widespread this practice is, and children have a right to be protected from it. Teachers found to be bringing these materials into our schools must be stopped and removed from the positions of trust and responsibility that they have abused.

In closing I would like to quote the Rt Revd Rowan Williams, who in March of this year went on record as saying:

“I think creationism is … a kind of category mistake, as if the Bible were a theory like other theories… ”

When the current Archbishop of Canterbury has publicly stated that the teaching of religion and science are separate concerns, the government has absolutely no excuse for hesitation in ensuring that this particularly sensitive area of the education system is protected, so that science teaching may remain scientific.

Yours sincerely,
Tom Ryan.

I don’t imagine it’ll make the slightest difference, but you have to try.

  1. rogan says:

    I love the open letter to the kansas state schoolboard, so much in fact that I’m going to stick the link here even though you’ve doubtless already read it
    http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/

  2. Tom Ryan says:

    Yeah, it’s genius. Obviously that’s plan B, but hopefully Britain’s education system ain’t so screwed as to require the intervention of His Noodliness just yet.

  3. MissPrism says:

    I wrote to mine on the same topic this morning, too!
    If your MP replies sensibly, you could follow up by asking her if she’ll sign Early Day Motion 2708 - link: http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=31313&SESSION=875

  4. Tom Ryan says:

    Ooh, smashing, thanks for pointing that out.

  5. Roxy says:

    I didn’t realise it was a problem. I remember when I was at school our head of RE and our Biology teacher had an argument about evolution and creationism. They both had very good arguments (by that I mean it wasn’t just “I’m right and you’re wrong”)and it was thoroughly enjoyable to see

  6. Tom Ryan says:

    Creationism and I.D. aren’t science, though, that’s the issue. They shouldn’t be taught in science lessons.

    Religous belief and evolutionary biology aren’t necessarily incompatible, but they should be separate as far as education is concerned. You wouldn’t bring God (or whoever) into a maths lesson, the same should hold for science.

    Save the debate for RE lessons, or whatever they call them now.

Leave a Reply